Director's Introduction

The Director of the Centre for Intelligent Design, Dr Alastair Noble, introduces the Intelligent Design debate in this 4 minute video clip.

Dr Alastair Noble's introduction to ID

© Centre for Intelligent Design

How the Scientific Consensus can hinder Science

How the Scientific Consensus can hinder Science

This article seeks to discuss "Scientific consensus" as it is understood today and how, in the past, scientific consensus has had to undergo seismic shifts. Read more

Intelligent Design is definitely NOT Creationism

Intelligent Design is definitely NOT Creationism

Dismissing Intelligent Design as 'Creationism' is the easy way of avoiding having to deal with the empirical evidence for design. Read more

Was there a cause of the universe?

Was there a cause of the universe?

Cosmologists tell us that we now know a fair amount of detail about the conditions of the universe from the first split second, 13.7 billion years ago. Read more

The Fine Tuned Universe

The Fine Tuned Universe

The words ‘fine tuning of the universe’ have been around for quite a while and are greeted with bafflement, scepticism and wonder; in about equal proportions. What on earth (or in the universe) does it mean? Theoretical physicist Paul Davies calls it the ‘Goldilocks Enigma’.1 Is it real... Read more

University finds brain's complexity beyond belief

University finds brain's complexity beyond belief

RESEARCHERS  have found that a single human brain has more molecular-scale switches than all the computers, routers and Internet connections on the entire planet! Read more

Your privacy .....

..... and our use of cookies

Cookies help us improve your online experience with the Centre for Intelligent Design.  If you accept their use, please continue using our site.  By continuing to use www.c4id.org.uk you will be agreeing to the website Terms and Conditions where you will find our Privacy Policy and an explanation of our Use of Cookies.

Follow us on Twitter.....

..... meet us on Facebook

Doubly designed?

Metamorphosis: the beauty and design of butterflies

Watch this 4' 22" video clip to explore the world of butterflies which, in the words of the commentary, are shown to be doubly designed!

Metamorphosis: The Beauty & Design of Butterflies

Academic Freedom

See the menu item ACADEMIC FREEDOM. To quote from the lead in to the page: ".... However, there is another key issue raised by ID.  It is the freedom of academics and science educators to explore and discuss the issues associated with ID.  The exploration of ID within science should not be dismissed as something it is not – a disguised religious position."

Press Release

The Centre for Intelligent Design on September 27th 2011 issued a press release and additional material relating to the call by Prof Richard Dawkins, Sir David Attenborough and others for a legal  ban on Creationism and Intelligent Design in Britain's schools. Click here for the Press Release page.

Meyer vs Fox on Premier Radio:

Is Intelligence allowed in Biological Science?

Don’t miss a most revealing debate on Premier Radio between Stephen Meyer, a leading proponent of Intelligent Design who directs the Centre for Science and Culture at the Discovery Institute in Seattle, and Keith Fox, Professor of Biochemistry at Southampton University, who also chairs the UK Christians in Science network.

This programme was broadcast when Dr Meyer was in London recently for the Inaugural Lecture of the Centre for Intelligent Design, UK. That event focused on Dr Meyer’s recent book ‘Signature in the Cell’ – a Times Literary Supplement Book of the Year - which claims to show that the DNA code is the product of intelligent mind, not naturalistic processes. Prof Fox disagrees strongly with ID, arguing instead that, given time, scientists should be able to work out a naturalistic explanation. The core of this debate is not just how life could have originated, but whether intelligent mind as a cause is allowed as an explanation in science. Click here to find the broadcast.

London Spectator hails Denton's Evolution:Still a Theory in Crisis as a "Best Book" of 2016

"A truly great book.....Fascinatingly clear.....Destroys the Darwinian position," according to distinguished literary critic A. N. Wilson.

A Real Darwinian Eye-opener at Malvern

The 130 or so delegates who attended the Intelligent Design Annual Conference at Malvern, England, on September 28/29, 2012, were treated to a real Darwinian eye-opener from world-class speakers Dr Doug Axe (Biologic Institute, Seattle) and Prof John Lennox (Oxford).  If you think neo-Darwinism is beyond scientific dispute and that the design debate is an irrelevance, you should have heard this.

Elim Conference Centre

Particularly telling was Axe’s exposition of the current criticisms of Darwinian evolution in the scientific literature, made all the more powerful because they come from sources that do not apparently endorse Intelligent Design.

And the criticisms are not minor.  Deep doubts about the accuracy of the universal tree of life, embarrassing discrepancies in the genetic data for the accepted evolutionary path from early apes to humans, and evidence that mutation and natural selection just cannot provide a mechanism for evolutionary change are among the major areas being elucidated.  To support his argument, Doug Axe quoted a number of papers from respected and readily available scientific journals.  These references will be made available in due course.

At one point Axe likened Darwinism to a chair which has had all its legs removed, but still manages to support all that rests on it.  ‘Scientific levitation’, was the spontaneous reaction of a member of the audience.  All very funny if it wasn’t so serious.

According to Axe, Darwinism is currently being revised beyond recognition.  But the scientific consensus clings to certain non-negotiable dogmas, including the proposition that there is a tree of life and that it has a purely natural cause.  So if you want to be recognised as a professional scientist, don’t stray beyond these boundaries, despite where you may think the evidence points.  Is this really science or a crude distortion of its method?

In a session about an alternative design paradigm for biology and the evidence supporting it, Axe used an analogy about how all the world’s literature came to be assembled.  In a Darwinian world, the compilation of all the world’s libraries from letters and text, through sentences, paragraphs, pages, books and collections, up to complete libraries would have to be attributed to a ‘bottom up’, multiple, simple typographical errors accumulating over long periods of time.  In reality, of course, libraries arise from a ‘top down’ process of the expression and application of intelligent mind.

So, you might wonder, how is it that neo-Darwinian theory is maintained by the scientific community in the face of growing contrary evidence?  Well, the conference explored the view that the answer lies in the implications of the design argument.  It’s not that the evidence for design in nature is suspect.  It’s just that its philosophical and religious implications make it unacceptable.  No-one has put it better than the Harvard biologist, Richard Lewontin:

It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated.  Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a divine foot in the door.

So there you have it.  And John Lennox, in his brilliant survey of the controversy around the design argument, stressed that the essential problem is not the quality of the evidence, but the worldview that is brought to interpret the evidence.  This tension is as old as the Greek philosophers and is ultimately about whether a creative cause beyond Nature can be considered.

There are only two possibilities.  Either Nature is all there is, or there is an intelligent cause beyond Nature.  Modern science has now endorsed the former, a position which is not only un-provable, but which flies in the face of the scientific evidence.  Ironic too that almost all of the pioneers of modern science were theists who found their science possible and fulfilling because they detected cause, effect and rationality in the universe.

In a devastating critique of the New Atheism, Lennox claimed that political correctness paralyses rational debate and that materialism, with its reductionist agenda, actually undermines rationality.  If what we recognise as rational thought is no more than random chemical processes in our brains, how can we regard any pronouncement as valid, including the conclusion that minds are the product of a purely material cause?  The bottom line, as C S Lewis the Oxford don and Christian apologist contended years ago, is that the existence of reason within nature points to a need for reason outside of nature, such as a transcendent intelligent cause.

And natural law, Lennox pointed out, on which so many materialistic claims are built, can describe phenomena, but don’t explain how or why the laws exist in the first place.  An understanding of how things work leaves the issue of causal agency unaffected.  You can explain a Ford motor car, Lennox claims, in terms of the laws which govern motion and combustion, but you are still left with the need for the designer – Henry Ford and his successor engineers!

This was a thoroughly stimulating conference which dealt with the science of design and its profound implications.  It also included extended periods of debate around the key issues arising from intelligent design, indicating that a growing body of informed opinion is sympathetic to the position.  The proceedings of this conference will be made available as soon as practicable.  Make sure you get them!

Some of the issues raised at this conference can be found in ‘Science and Human Origins’, a recent publication from Discovery Institute Press (2102).  A comment by Doug Axe in that book provides a fitting summary of the ID conference.  Writing about Darwin’s view of the world, he writes:

‘As someone who loves science, I have to say that I can think of no conclusion in the whole history of the discipline that is so firm and profound and so original that it should cause every human being to stop and rethink what it means to be human.  Most simply aren’t that profound.  I happen to think that Darwin’s was that profound, but thankfully, also profoundly wrong.’ (p43)

Alastair Noble


Biographical Note

Doug AxeDr Doug Axe is the director of the Biologic Institute, Seattle USA.  After a Caltech PhD he held postdoctoral and research positions at the University of Cambridge, the Cambridge Medical Research Council Centre, and the Babraham Institute in Cambridge.  Doug's work has been reviewed in Nature and featured in a number of publications.

John LennoxProf John Lennox
is Professor of Mathematics at Oxford University, a Fellow in Mathematics and Philosophy of Science at Green Templeton College, Oxford University and acclaimed author of numerous titles including,  ‘God and Stephen Hawking: Whose Design is it anyway?’.
John has debated the issues of this conference with leading evolutionary theorists including Richard Dawkins, the late Christopher Hitchens and Peter Singer.

Prof Mike Behe UK Tour

Prof Mike Behe, Professor of Chemistry at Lehigh University, USA, toured the UK in November 2010.  He is author of Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. For one week he gave lectures and was a speaker at a day conference in Oxford. Click here for a report on the tour.

Premier Radio interview

Mike Behe is adamant that the latest science proves Intelligent Design to be true. He recently spoke to Premier Radio presenter Justin Brierley, who will be hosting the London leg of the Darwin or Design tour on Monday November 22nd, 2010. Justin began by asking Behe how it feels to be labelled a "maverick" by the majority of the scientific community.

Hear Prof Mike Behe

Press comment

GUARDIAN - UK Centre for Intelligent Design claims it will focus on science, not religion

NATURE - Blogs - New intelligent design centre launches in Britain - September 24, 2010

Dr Noble says. "I would stress that we’re not targeting schools."